Welcome to TechForums.info!   


Why Do Liberals Want To Increase Taxes On The Wealth Producers In Our Economy?

HDTV Discussion

Why Do Liberals Want To Increase Taxes On The Wealth Producers In Our Economy?

Postby Stowe » Mon Sep 11, 2017 6:19 am


The simple fact is, consumption inequality-the difference in lifestyles between the rich and the poor-is rapidly decreasing, regardless of the direction of income inequality.
Rich people can have a luxury box seat at the movies, but the masses can have a massaging chair an HDTV that gives an even better view of the game.
The poor and the rich alike can all drive cars that travel at high speeds, have electronic stability control and antilock bracks, navigation systems, and voice recognition systems like SYNC.

The difference is that rich people work for 60 TO 80 HOURS A WEEK.
Their the ones who actually PRODUCE the products.
Most people have NO idea how to program a computer or build the goods they buy(or how they're built), and they can work a 40-hour week and have a lifestyle similar to rich people.

Liberals think that we should INCREASE TAXES on the rich producers of society.
This is ridiculous! Think about this: why work 60-80 hours a week with a risk of losing everything if I screw up and have to pay even more to the government when I can have a lifestyle not that much different and work for someone else for 40 hours a week?

If the producers in our economy stopped innovating and producing, our economy would collapse.
Liberals need to stop bullying job creators and start encouraging them.
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 11:56 pm

Why Do Liberals Want To Increase Taxes On The Wealth Producers In Our Economy?

Postby Conn » Mon Sep 11, 2017 4:21 pm

Because they want the government and wealthy people to solve their problems. Liberals don't realize that the top 1% (as far as grose yearly income) paid more than 70% of last years total income tax, while the bottom 50% made up less than 3%. The occupy movement is just another way for people to complain that the government is giving them all the money that they want. And almost all of the wealthy people in America got their money by working hard and making wise investments. Sure, there are the cheaters and sumbags, but every social class has those.
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 6:37 pm

Why Do Liberals Want To Increase Taxes On The Wealth Producers In Our Economy?

Postby Crowley » Tue Sep 12, 2017 8:40 pm

No the GOP does. http://www.rollcall.com/news/gop_blocks_... http://wonkette.com/474319/gop-lawmaker-... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-cre...


Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 1:58 am

Why Do Liberals Want To Increase Taxes On The Wealth Producers In Our Economy?

Postby ShannynSossamon » Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:59 pm

Fulfilling the Communist manifesto, check out this link.
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:36 am

Why Do Liberals Want To Increase Taxes On The Wealth Producers In Our Economy?

Postby Ealadhach » Wed Sep 13, 2017 7:50 pm

Uhm, because they either suck at economics, or it's a method they can use to control the means of production.

Ever notice how they go from wailing that government needs to do something that will create more jobs to insisting that government needs to raise taxes on those same businesses?

I'll never understand their "logic." I only assume they are only pretending to actually want jobs.

ETA: Notice the clown nose girl has prepared an edited list of Romney donors.
Here's the unedited list of Obama donors - it's ridiculous to pretend he isn't in bed with the bankers and Wall St.

University of California $1,648,685
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 5:29 pm

Why Do Liberals Want To Increase Taxes On The Wealth Producers In Our Economy?

Postby Lamar » Sun Sep 17, 2017 1:43 am

Because Parasite Liberals & Democrats "think" they will get Bigger Welfare Checks.

And Democrats are Raised to be Jealous, Full of Envy, and Full of Hate -- by their Welfare Parents.
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:13 am

Why Do Liberals Want To Increase Taxes On The Wealth Producers In Our Economy?

Postby Bardon » Mon Sep 18, 2017 7:31 am

The democrat party only cares about its century-old Agenda:

Democrat President Wilson (1913-1918) presented The Agenda in broad terms, saying ?You are not here merely to make a living. You are here to enable the world to live more amply, with greater vision, and with a finer spirit of hope and achievement. You are here to enrich the world. You impoverish yourself if you forget this errand.?

He may have been the first democrat to realize the value of multiculturalism (?If it ain?t American, it?s good!?) in deconstructing America, saying, ?No nation is fit to sit in judgment upon any other nation.? Obama put it this way: "Every nation is exceptional in its own way."

Democrat President Roosevelt (1933-1945) articulated the Agenda before Congress on January 11, 1944:

?We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights...? which included:

-The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation

-The right of every family to a decent home

-The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health

-The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment.

The Agenda advanced hugely with LBJ?s Great Society, and Obama?s ?Hope and Change? is a Great Leap Forward.

The Agenda is? To reconstitute America as a European style welfare state.

Democrats overwhelmingly support it:

-2/4/10 Gallup poll: 61% of liberals have a positive view of socialism.

-6/2/11 Gallup poll: 71% of democrats favor re-distributing wealth.

-Now they have national health care, the foundation of all welfare and socialist states.

Democrat government union workers love the Agenda because the Party ?takes care of them,? and in return the Party gets most of the unions? political cash:

-7/8/11 U. S. News Report (usnews.com): The actual number of private sector jobs decreased since 2008. Government jobs increased.

-6/8/12 Investors Business Daily: ?Private-sector jobs are still down by 4.6 million, or 4%, from January 2008, when overall employment peaked. Meanwhile, government jobs are down just 407,000, or 1.8%. Federal employment actually is 225,000 jobs above its January 2008 level, an 11.4% increase.?

-3/31/10 postalemployeenetwork.com: ?Postmaster Potter has made headway in reducing work hours and the costs of benefits and pensions, but the average postal employee still makes $83,000 in salary and benefits a year, placing postal workers among the highest-paid government employees.? (in Newsweek)

-8/13/10 USA Today: Federal civil servants earned average pay and benefits of $123,049 in 2009 while private workers made $61,051 in total compensation, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

-2/22/12 CNN, Buffalo, NY: ?The sweet deal that all the 3,400 teachers in Buffalo are eligible to get under one of their insurance plan options, they are billed nothing for any plastic surgery procedure, such as botox, liposuction, tummy tucks, and there is no deductible..."

-6/11/12 Cato Institute (http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obama-vs-... ?...teacher employment has exploded ? the public school workforce has grown 11 times faster than student enrollment over the last 40 years.? ?Furthermore, on a per pupil basis, the inflation-adjusted average cost of a K-12 education has gone from about $55,000 to about $150,000.?

-6/14/12 townhall.com: Every pay period, the Philadelphia school district puts $155 per union member into a special fund that helps educators pay their personal legal bills, which includes everything from routine legal advice to estate planning.

Ignorant democrats are unaware of the Agenda because they get their ?news? from the grossly pro-Agenda, liberal media:

Polls on how Americans saw the mainstream media (TV and print) election coverage in 2008:

-Rasmussen poll: 69% for Obama, 6% for McCain

-Pew Research poll: 67% for Obama, 11% for McCain

-Sacred Heart University poll: 68% for Obama, 9% for McCain

-Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll: 67% for Obama, 11% for McCain

University of Connecticut?s Department of Public Policy survey of journalists, nationwide, during the 2008 election: 52% supported Obama versus 19% for McCain.

The democrat party?s devotion to changing America into a European style welfare state is well documented.
If you want America to look like the bankrupt EU in a few years, the democrat party is there to help you push us over the cliff.

(11/5/11 AP: Self-professed conservatives now outnumber self-professed liberals in the United States, 42 percent to 21 percent)
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 5:12 am

Why Do Liberals Want To Increase Taxes On The Wealth Producers In Our Economy?

Postby Leifr » Tue Sep 19, 2017 6:52 am

Well that's the hindrance. Liberals don't seem to fully grasp the dynamics of cash. How way more can a billionaire buy. The money for the rich is more like features and is sequestered in funding and relatively is just not absorbing resources. When you give extra to the poor, costs of restrictive fabric would go up. Giving more to the terrible would not imply more oil on the planet. Granted if you happen to take some cash from the rich and provides it to terrible americans, the american citizens would have more, but on the cost of other countries. Men and women don't appreciate the negative in the us is an oppressive force too, preying on the poor of other countries. The coffee they drink comes at a substandard tradition for those who prefer them. Liberals whinge about poverty in the us, nevertheless it does not exist. We don';t have people starving in teh streets. My family seen the depression and lives in 1/3 world nation, and no what real poverty is, and it is insulting how liberals go on. I am not pronouncing we should no longer fix the revenue inequality, however my perception just isn't so much as to make the lifetime of the bad so significantly better however for a healthy center category and give an opportunity for the poor to have a greater life. I grant people who say I over simplify how cash works, but I do not need to write a book.
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 7:04 am

Why Do Liberals Want To Increase Taxes On The Wealth Producers In Our Economy?

Postby Thorp » Fri Sep 29, 2017 10:36 pm

So, what you're telling us is, because you're poorer than Paris Hilton, that means that you're lazier and dumber, and produce less, than she does.

Got it.
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 1:18 am

Why Do Liberals Want To Increase Taxes On The Wealth Producers In Our Economy?

Postby Hiatt » Sun Oct 01, 2017 7:20 am

because they are doing it in china
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:54 am

Return to HDTV


  • Related topics
    Last post